← Back
CLASS 6A · District 22-6A

Katy Tigers

Enrollment: 3,401 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#10
was #10
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2427
#10 of 249
OVR Grade
90.6
#10 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
#12Humble Atascocita (0-0) 2401
53% (+1)
2
@#13Dickinson (0-0) 2378
55% (+2)
3
@Katy Tompkins (0-0) 1710
95% (+29)
4
Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820
93% (+24)
5
@Katy Cinco Ranch (0-0) 1726
95% (+28)
6
Katy Seven Lakes (0-0) 1275
> 98% (+46)
7
@Katy Morton Ranch (0-0) 1182
> 98% (+50)
8
Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598
97% (+33)
10
@Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011
> 98% (+57)
11
Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364
> 98% (+43)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 22-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 10
Tigers
90.6
2427
0-0 0-0 7.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 59
Warriors
81.4
1820
0-0 0-0 5.7-2.3 90.1% D1
3 69
Cougars
80
1726
0-0 0-0 5.1-2.9 77.9% D1
4 72
Falcons
79.8
1710
0-0 0-0 5-3 73.8% D2
5 93
Panthers
78.1
1598
0-0 0-0 4.4-3.6 44.9%
6 153
Rams
74.5
1364
0-0 0-0 2.9-5.2 8.2%
7 170
Spartans
73.2
1275
0-0 0-0 2.3-5.7 3.6%
8 181
Mavericks
71.8
1182
0-0 0-0 1.8-6.2 < 2%
9 206
Mustangs
69.2
1011
0-0 0-0 1-7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015
16-0
Rating 942 (100th)
#2 · 2012
16-0
Rating 898 (100th)
#3 · 2020
13-1
Rating 872 (100th)
#4 · 2007
16-0
Rating 861 (100th)
#5 · 2013
15-1
Rating 834 (99th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 10-3 2289 45.5 18.9 +26.6 1655 +19.2 −14.9 +34.1 2352 +1.62 +2.02 −0.40 716(95th)
2024 11-2 2418 40.4 14.8 +25.6 1673 +16.1 −17.0 +33.1 2327 +3.11 +3.19 −0.08 736(96th)
2023 10-2 2232 43.5 15.9 +27.6 1577 +17.3 −12.1 +29.4 2235 +1.85 +2.17 −0.33 710(95th)
2022 14-1 2641 48.9 15.7 +33.1 1793 +26.2 −19.1 +45.3 2633 +5.79 +5.86 −0.08 808(99th)
2021 14-1 2706 45.5 15.3 +30.3 1904 +24.7 −21.9 +46.7 2667 +6.14 +6.15 −0.01 823(99th)
2020 13-1 2733 49.1 11.9 +37.3 1885 +28.8 −23.4 +52.2 2804 +6.45 +6.63 −0.18 872(100th)
2019 12-1 2616 43.4 13.3 +30.1 2019 +23.0 −24.6 +47.6 2691 +5.86 +5.87 −0.02 813(99th)
2018 11-2 2476 49.9 14.8 +35.1 1881 +27.4 −22.6 +50.1 2752 +3.73 +3.88 −0.15 805(99th)
2017 12-1 2641 43.0 7.7 +35.3 1792 +21.8 −25.2 +47.0 2675 +5.29 +5.31 −0.03 828(99th)
2016 10-3 2533 42.2 15.5 +26.6 1830 +20.6 −18.8 +39.3 2483 +3.11 +3.36 −0.26 761(98th)
2015 16-0 2915 48.6 3.9 +44.8 1748 +26.1 −29.1 +55.2 2880 +7.31 +7.31 0.00 942(100th)
2014 14-2 2637 48.0 9.7 +38.3 1724 +24.0 −21.7 +45.7 2643 +4.92 +5.20 −0.29 826(99th)
2013 15-1 2659 43.2 7.9 +35.2 1778 +21.9 −23.7 +45.6 2640 +6.61 +6.66 −0.05 834(99th)
2012 16-0 2752 51.8 12.9 +38.9 1758 +26.6 −21.5 +48.1 2704 +7.12 +7.12 0.00 898(100th)
2011 12-1 2512 42.6 7.5 +35.2 1607 +20.1 −19.9 +40.0 2500 +4.15 +4.36 −0.21 777(98th)
2010 13-1 2502 49.2 17.0 +32.2 1722 +25.0 −15.2 +40.1 2503 +4.58 +4.71 −0.13 757(98th)
2009 14-2 2390 32.1 12.6 +19.5 1757 +11.5 −18.4 +30.0 2249 +5.04 +5.36 −0.32 747(97th)
2008 13-3 2491 32.3 12.3 +20.0 1776 +13.1 −18.5 +31.7 2291 +3.66 +4.79 −1.13 781(98th)
2007 16-0 2558 43.8 8.2 +35.6 1613 +21.0 −19.0 +39.9 2498 +5.75 +5.75 0.00 861(100th)
2006 13-1 2286 33.2 8.1 +25.1 1596 +11.6 −16.7 +28.3 2207 +3.11 +3.46 −0.36 728(96th)
2005 14-1 2365 38.1 12.2 +25.9 1682 +17.1 −14.0 +31.1 2278 +4.31 +4.33 −0.02 748(97th)
2004 12-2 2233 31.7 13.3 +18.4 1646 +12.6 −12.4 +25.0 2125 +2.75 +3.90 −1.15 708(95th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.