← Back

CLASS 6A · District 22-6A

Katy Mayde Creek Rams

Enrollment: 2,844 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 9

Rank

#153

was #153

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1364

#153 of 249

OVR Grade

74.5

#153 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292	57% (+3)	—	—	—	—
2	Cy Woods (0-0) 1458	40% (-4)	—	—	—	—
3	Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011	81% (+14)	—	—	—	—
5	@Katy Tompkins (0-0) 1710	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
6	Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
7	@Katy Cinco Ranch (0-0) 1726	18% (-14)	—	—	—	—
8	Katy Seven Lakes (0-0) 1275	59% (+4)	—	—	—	—
9	@Katy Morton Ranch (0-0) 1182	68% (+7)	—	—	—	—
10	Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598	27% (-9)	—	—	—	—
11	@#10Katy (0-0) 2427	< 2% (-43)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 22-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		10	Katy (4) Tigers	90.6 2427	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.8-0.2	> 98%	D2
2		59	Katy Jordan (3) Warriors	81.4 1820	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-2.3	90.1%	D1
3		69	Katy Cinco Ranch (2) Cougars	80 1726	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-2.9	77.9%	D1
4		72	Katy Tompkins (6) Falcons	79.8 1710	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-3	73.8%	D2
5		93	Katy Paetow (7) Panthers	78.1 1598	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-3.6	44.9%	—
6		153	Katy Mayde Creek (9) Rams	74.5 1364	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-5.2	8.2%	—
7		170	Katy Seven Lakes (1) Spartans	73.2 1275	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-5.7	3.6%	—
8		181	Katy Morton Ranch (8) Mavericks	71.8 1182	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-6.2	< 2%	—
9		206	Katy Taylor (5) Mustangs	69.2 1011	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy Mayde Creek’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019

9-3

Rating 551 (62nd)

#2 · 2004

5-5

Rating 532 (56th)

#3 · 2008

5-5

Rating 524 (53rd)

#4 · 2020

4-5

Rating 514 (50th)

#5 · 2025

4-6

Rating 506 (47th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1325	31.1	30.3	+0.8	1511	+0.3	+0.7	−0.4	1489	−3.42	+0.51	−3.92	506(47th)
2024	5-5	1359	19.2	23.7	−4.5	1491	−7.9	−3.2	−4.7	1384	−2.51	+0.42	−2.93	496(42nd)
2023	3-7	955	14.4	33.2	−18.8	1369	−15.2	+9.1	−24.3	894	−4.79	+0.24	−5.03	398(14th)
2022	2-8	950	17.5	39.3	−21.8	1592	−11.0	+7.2	−18.2	1044	−4.64	+0.20	−4.84	409(17th)
2021	2-8	1135	14.3	41.8	−27.5	1685	−11.1	+11.2	−22.3	942	−4.71	+0.07	−4.79	409(17th)
2020	4-5	1477	27.3	31.3	−4.0	1629	+3.6	+2.2	+1.4	1536	−1.91	+0.46	−2.37	514(50th)
2019	9-3	1689	26.8	23.1	+3.7	1521	+0.8	−4.4	+5.2	1629	+0.36	+1.31	−0.95	551(62nd)
2018	3-7	1138	34.1	37.4	−3.3	1474	+4.4	+8.6	−4.1	1396	−4.54	+0.09	−4.63	472(34th)
2017	3-6	1004	28.3	41.7	−13.3	1527	+3.8	+15.4	−11.6	1210	−3.34	+0.12	−3.47	435(23rd)
2016	1-9	614	15.7	33.4	−17.7	1510	−12.2	+5.9	−18.1	1046	−6.84	+0.02	−6.86	378(11th)
2015	0-10	648	16.6	36.4	−19.8	1511	−11.7	+8.3	−20.0	1001	−7.53	0.00	−7.53	374(10th)
2014	2-8	894	13.5	32.8	−19.3	1441	−14.5	+6.6	−21.1	971	−5.34	+0.06	−5.40	394(13th)
2013	1-9	725	7.5	32.0	−24.5	1519	−16.9	+5.0	−21.9	954	−6.12	+0.02	−6.14	377(11th)
2012	3-7	1002	30.5	37.7	−7.2	1479	−0.1	+8.6	−8.7	1282	−4.19	+0.10	−4.29	446(26th)
2011	1-8	925	14.8	36.4	−21.7	1519	−10.3	+10.6	−20.9	977	−5.37	+0.06	−5.44	401(15th)
2010	2-8	1065	15.8	34.7	−18.9	1549	−11.7	+5.1	−16.8	1080	−5.14	+0.16	−5.30	428(21st)
2009	1-9	1040	16.2	33.0	−16.8	1574	−8.4	+5.5	−13.9	1153	−6.19	+0.10	−6.29	434(23rd)
2008	5-5	1485	21.9	28.1	−6.2	1673	−1.4	−2.2	+0.8	1519	−2.04	+0.57	−2.61	524(53rd)
2007	6-5	1439	20.5	29.5	−8.9	1492	−4.6	+3.2	−7.8	1306	−1.84	+0.90	−2.74	493(42nd)
2006	1-9	958	12.5	30.1	−17.6	1547	−11.2	+4.9	−16.1	1096	−6.50	+0.03	−6.53	422(20th)
2005	1-8	1040	19.7	34.7	−15.0	1571	−3.0	+10.5	−13.5	1162	−6.03	+0.17	−6.20	439(24th)
2004	5-5	1436	17.5	15.4	+2.1	1449	−5.1	−5.3	+0.2	1505	−2.65	+0.68	−3.34	532(56th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.