← Back

CLASS 6A · District 22-6A

Katy Morton Ranch Mavericks

Enrollment: 2,934 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#181

was #181

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1182

#181 of 249

OVR Grade

71.8

#181 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Cy Creek (0-0) 1081	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
2	@Conroe (0-0) 1483	22% (-12)	—	—	—	—
3	@Katy Cinco Ranch (0-0) 1726	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
4	Katy Seven Lakes (0-0) 1275	40% (-4)	—	—	—	—
6	@Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598	15% (-17)	—	—	—	—
7	#10Katy (0-0) 2427	< 2% (-50)	—	—	—	—
8	@Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011	67% (+7)	—	—	—	—
9	Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364	32% (-7)	—	—	—	—
10	@Katy Tompkins (0-0) 1710	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
11	Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820	6% (-26)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 22-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		10	Katy (4) Tigers	90.6 2427	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.8-0.2	> 98%	D2
2		59	Katy Jordan (3) Warriors	81.4 1820	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-2.3	90.1%	D1
3		69	Katy Cinco Ranch (2) Cougars	80 1726	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-2.9	77.9%	D1
4		72	Katy Tompkins (6) Falcons	79.8 1710	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-3	73.8%	D2
5		93	Katy Paetow (7) Panthers	78.1 1598	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-3.6	44.9%	—
6		153	Katy Mayde Creek (9) Rams	74.5 1364	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-5.2	8.2%	—
7		170	Katy Seven Lakes (1) Spartans	73.2 1275	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-5.7	3.6%	—
8		181	Katy Morton Ranch (8) Mavericks	71.8 1182	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-6.2	< 2%	—
9		206	Katy Taylor (5) Mustangs	69.2 1011	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy Morton Ranch’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013

7-4

Rating 576 (71st)

#2 · 2022

7-4

Rating 566 (67th)

#3 · 2012

7-3

Rating 554 (63rd)

#4 · 2011

6-5

Rating 526 (54th)

#5 · 2019

5-5

Rating 523 (53rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-7	1163	18.7	41.5	−22.8	1533	−9.1	+11.7	−20.8	981	−3.98	+0.22	−4.20	423(20th)
2024	0-10	976	16.4	35.3	−18.9	1553	−9.5	+7.0	−16.4	1089	−7.12	0.00	−7.12	421(20th)
2023	2-8	1214	26.5	31.6	−5.1	1407	−1.5	+7.4	−8.9	1278	−5.84	+0.17	−6.01	472(34th)
2022	7-4	1670	37.0	33.7	+3.3	1611	+10.8	+1.8	+9.0	1725	−0.06	+1.33	−1.39	566(67th)
2021	4-6	1494	24.6	30.3	−5.7	1616	−2.1	+1.7	−3.8	1406	−2.63	+0.44	−3.07	503(45th)
2020	3-6	1512	21.1	31.8	−10.7	1692	−2.1	+0.8	−2.8	1429	−2.63	+0.33	−2.96	504(46th)
2019	5-5	1482	22.8	22.2	+0.6	1550	−5.3	−7.5	+2.2	1554	−2.00	+0.40	−2.40	523(53rd)
2018	5-5	1476	23.4	23.9	−0.5	1467	−4.0	−4.5	+0.5	1513	−2.34	+0.47	−2.81	517(51st)
2017	3-6	1193	23.4	29.9	−6.4	1503	−2.0	+4.2	−6.2	1344	−3.44	+0.10	−3.54	470(33rd)
2016	5-6	1451	27.7	32.7	−5.0	1543	+3.0	+5.3	−2.4	1441	−2.84	+0.47	−3.31	506(46th)
2015	5-6	1568	22.7	30.5	−7.7	1614	−1.4	−0.2	−1.2	1470	−2.17	+0.79	−2.97	519(52nd)
2014	4-5	1521	23.1	25.0	−1.9	1523	−2.6	−2.0	−0.6	1484	−2.29	+0.33	−2.62	518(51st)
2013	7-4	1703	30.5	22.6	+7.9	1564	+6.9	−4.5	+11.5	1787	−0.53	+0.63	−1.16	576(71st)
2012	7-3	1640	36.5	31.9	+4.6	1498	+9.0	+2.4	+6.6	1665	−0.28	+0.99	−1.27	554(63rd)
2011	6-5	1445	20.5	23.9	−3.4	1648	−2.3	−5.1	+2.9	1571	−0.93	+1.06	−1.99	526(54th)
2010	1-9	833	15.2	45.5	−30.3	1644	−10.1	+13.4	−23.6	911	−5.90	+0.35	−6.25	384(12th)
2009	1-9	1029	10.2	35.7	−25.5	1518	−15.1	+8.4	−23.5	911	−6.25	+0.05	−6.30	401(15th)
2008	6-4	1401	28.2	30.3	−2.1	1558	+3.7	+1.9	+1.8	1546	−1.64	+0.84	−2.48	520(52nd)
2007	1-9	943	15.3	33.0	−17.7	1541	−8.0	+7.3	−15.3	1117	−6.74	+0.08	−6.82	423(20th)
2006	0-10	851	7.1	35.3	−28.2	1485	−16.2	+10.9	−27.0	825	−7.63	0.00	−7.63	376(11th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.