District Standings & Projections

Region I Top 10

Rk		Team	OVR/ Elo	Dist / Proj	Record	SOS	PPG	PAPG	Last Wk	This Wk
2	-1	Allen Eagles	97.1 2857	6-6A Div 1	6-0	2129 (#3)	53.0	13.2	W 70-3 vs McKinney	#111 Prosper Rock Hill
9	8	Lewisville Fighting Farmers	91 2457	5-6A Div 1	3-3	1901 (#16)	45.7	14.2	W 42-7 vs Denton Guyer	#60 Lewisville Hebron
11	1	Prosper Eagles	90 2389	6-6A Div 1	5-1	2091 (#6)	50.3	34.8	W 63-12 vs Prosper Rock Hill	#91 Dallas Jesuit
14		Southlake Carroll Dragons	89.6 2362	4-6A Div 2	4-2	1934 (#13)	34.5	26.5	W 44-7 vs Justin Northwest	#66 Keller
19	-9	Denton Guyer Wildcats	87.9 2248	5-6A Div 2	4-2	1996 (#9)	32.5	21.5	L 7-42 vs Lewisville	#139 Little Elm
21		Coppell Cowboys	87.4 2214	7-6A Div 1	5-1	1637 (#71)	42.5	13.0	W 26-10 vs Plano	#86 Richardson Lake Highlands
31	-4	Prosper Walnut Grove Wildcats	85.3 2078	6-6A Div 2	5-1	1676 (#59)	46.2	24.2	L 49-50 vs Dallas Jesuit	#163 McKinney Boyd
32	12	Odessa Permian Panthers	85.1 2062	2-6A Div 1	7-0	1748 (#43)	39.6	19.3	W 42-10 vs Midland Lee	#215 Odessa
45	5	Aledo Bearcats	83.8 1975	3-6A Div 2	3-3	1777 (#33)	31.2	17.2	W 45-7 vs Arlington Bowie	#108 Arlington
48	-2	Arlington Martin Warriors	83.6 1961	3-6A Div 1	6-0	1448 (#136)	42.7	20.8	W 63-14 vs Arlington Sam Houston	#101 Arlington Bowie
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com

District 1-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	84	El Paso Pebble Hills (2) Spartans	79.8 1710	6-1	3-0	37.6	22.6	5.8-0.1	> 98%	D1
2	98	El Paso Eastwood (7) Troopers	78.3 1614	5-2	2-1	43.3	20.6	4.9-1.1	> 98%	D2
3	160	El Paso Eastlake (1) Falcons	73.9 1323	4-2	0-2	34.7	41.3	3.4-2.6	88%	D1
4	186	El Paso Franklin (4) Cougars	71 1129	3-3	2-0	30.7	23.2	3-3	68.8%	D2
5	196	El Paso Coronado (5) Thunderbirds	70.2 1079	4-3	2-1	26.1	26.0	2.8-3.2	43.2%	—
6	239	El Paso Socorro (3) Bulldogs	62.3 552	2-3	0-2	30.2	31.8	0.5-5.5	< 2%	—
7	238	El Paso Montwood (6) Rams	62.5 569	0-7	0-3	15.1	43.4	0.6-5.4	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 2-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	32	Odessa Permian (1) Panthers	85.1 2062	7-0	1-0	39.6	19.3	3.7-0.3	> 98%	D1
2	89	Midland (4) Bulldogs	79.2 1670	4-3	1-0	29.9	18.4	2.3-1.7	> 98%	D2
3	90	Midland Lee (3) Rebels	79.2 1669	4-3	0-1	34.6	31.3	2.1-1.9	> 98%	D1
4	105	San Angelo Central (5) Bobcats	77.6 1566	4-2	0-0	33.2	25.8	1.8-2.2	96.5%	D2
5	215	Odessa (2) Bronchos	67.6 906	2-5	0-1	21.7	29.4	0.1-3.9	5.5%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 3-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	48	Arlington Martin (2) Warriors	83.6 1961	6-0	3-0	42.7	20.8	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2	45	Aledo (6) Bearcats	83.8 1975	3-3	2-1	31.2	17.2	5.7-1.3	> 98%	D2
3	101	Arlington Bowie (7) Volunteers	77.9 1586	3-3	2-1	23.7	28.3	4.3-2.6	87.3%	D2
4	108	Arlington (3) Colts	77.5 1558	4-2	2-1	37.7	26.3	3.5-3.5	56.6%	D1
5	145	Weatherford (4) Kangaroos	75 1393	4-2	2-1	31.8	26.8	3.6-3.4	48.1%	—
6	129	Arlington Lamar (5) Vikings	76 1461	3-3	1-2	28.3	28.7	3.1-3.9	9.4%	—
7	219	Granbury (8) Pirates	66.6 838	2-4	0-3	30.2	40.5	0.7-6.3	< 2%	—
8	221	Arlington Sam Houston (1) Texans	66.2 813	3-3	0-3	25.7	32.2	0.6-6.4	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 4-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	14	Southlake Carroll (6) Dragons	89.6 2362	4-2	3-0	34.5	26.5	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D2
2	66	Keller (3) Indians	81.2 1806	6-0	3-0	51.5	34.3	5.4-1.6	> 98%	D1
3	78	Keller Central (8) Chargers	80.1 1731	4-2	1-2	36.2	24.3	3.9-3.1	79.4%	D2
4	93	Byron Nelson (2) Bobcats	78.9 1653	3-3	1-2	33.8	43.5	3.4-3.6	53.8%	D1
5	114	Northwest Eaton (1) Eagles	77.1 1535	2-4	1-2	22.3	31.5	3.3-3.7	34.5%	—
6	122	Keller Timber Creek (4) Falcons	76.8 1510	3-3	2-1	24.0	37.3	3.1-3.9	29.7%	—
7	154	Fort Worth Boswell (7) Pioneers	74.3 1350	3-3	1-2	37.7	29.8	1.7-5.3	3.2%	—
8	184	Justin Northwest (5) Texans	71.3 1148	0-6	0-3	22.2	34.2	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 5-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	9	Lewisville (1) Fighting Farmers	91 2457	3-3	3-0	45.7	14.2	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2	19	Denton Guyer (6) Wildcats	87.9 2248	4-2	2-1	32.5	21.5	5.7-1.3	> 98%	D2
3	60	Lewisville Hebron (2) Hawks	81.9 1854	4-2	3-0	25.3	26.2	4.5-2.5	87.7%	D1
4	75	Denton Braswell (5) Bengals	80.2 1736	5-1	2-1	30.8	26.7	4-3	84.9%	D2
5	81	Flower Mound (3) Jaguars	79.9 1720	5-1	2-1	31.2	16.2	3.2-3.8	24%	—
6	131	Frisco Wakeland (8) Wolverines	76 1457	2-4	0-3	16.3	35.0	1.6-5.4	3.1%	—
7	140	Flower Mound Marcus (4) Marauders	75.5 1424	2-4	0-3	23.0	36.5	1.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8	139	Little Elm (7) Lobos	75.5 1426	3-3	0-3	29.8	24.2	1-6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 6-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	2	Allen (1) Eagles	97.1 2857	6-0	3-0	53.0	13.2	7-0	> 98%	D1
2	11	Prosper (3) Eagles	90 2389	5-1	2-1	50.3	34.8	5.7-1.3	> 98%	D1
3	91	Dallas Jesuit (8) Rangers	79 1660	4-2	3-0	35.5	32.3	4.4-2.6	85.5%	D2
4	31	Prosper Walnut Grove (7) Wildcats	85.3 2078	5-1	2-1	46.2	24.2	4.2-2.8	> 98%	D2
5	111	Prosper Rock Hill (6) Blue Hawks	77.2 1541	3-3	1-2	19.5	31.2	2.9-4.2	10.2%	—
6	130	McKinney (5) Lions	76 1457	1-5	0-3	23.2	45.3	2.2-4.8	5.3%	—
7	163	McKinney Boyd (4) Broncos	73.6 1298	2-4	1-2	21.7	24.5	1.4-5.6	< 2%	—
8	194	Princeton (2) Panthers	70.4 1089	2-4	0-3	19.3	32.7	0.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 7-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	21	Coppell (3) Cowboys	87.4 2214	5-1	3-0	42.5	13.0	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2	86	Richardson Lake Highlands (5) Wildcats	79.6 1695	4-2	3-0	30.5	26.5	5.5-1.5	> 98%	D2
3	88	Plano East (2) Panthers	79.3 1678	4-2	2-1	32.2	18.7	4.3-2.7	87.2%	D1
4	97	Richardson Berkner (8) Rams	78.5 1624	2-4	1-2	27.0	27.0	3.9-3.1	76.1%	D2
5	133	Plano (4) Wildcats	75.9 1451	2-4	2-1	22.2	28.5	3.5-3.5	33.9%	—
6	157	Plano West (1) Wolves	74.2 1342	2-4	1-2	20.5	24.5	2.4-4.6	3.4%	—
7	206	Richardson Pearce (7) Mustangs	69.1 1004	0-6	0-3	12.0	38.0	0.6-6.4	< 2%	—
8	179	Richardson (6) Eagles	72 1192	1-5	0-3	20.8	40.5	1-6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 8-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	58	Euless Trinity (1) Trojans	82.2 1869	4-2	3-0	30.5	19.3	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2	79	South Grand Prairie (2) Warriors	80.1 1730	4-2	2-1	30.2	20.2	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3	144	Fort Worth Haltom (5) Buffaloes	75.2 1404	3-3	3-0	31.3	19.7	5.2-1.9	> 98%	D2
4	166	Hurst Bell (3) Blue Raiders	73.4 1286	3-3	2-1	28.5	15.0	3.9-3.1	84%	D2
5	204	Irving MacArthur (6) Cardinals	69.5 1027	3-3	1-2	28.2	29.3	2.9-4.1	16.7%	—
6	209	Grand Prairie (4) Gophers	68.5 962	3-3	1-2	14.8	27.3	2.4-4.6	< 2%	—
7	246	Irving (8) Tigers	60.5 436	0-6	0-3	8.2	54.7	0.8-6.2	< 2%	—
8	247	Irving Nimitz (7) Vikings	58.9 325	1-5	0-3	21.0	33.0	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

Region II Top 10

Rk		Team	OVR/ Elo	Dist / Proj	Record	SOS	PPG	PAPG	Last Wk	This Wk
1	2	North Crowley Panthers	97.5 2885	11-6A Div 2	6-0	2280 (#1)	38.5	15.2	W 42-17 vs Waxahachie	#56 Mansfield Lake Ridge
4		Waxahachie Indians	93.4 2612	11-6A Div 1	5-1	1998 (#8)	47.3	25.2	L 17-42 vs North Crowley	#83 Red Oak
7		Duncanville Panthers	91.5 2485	11-6A Div 1	3-3	2112 (#5)	29.7	18.0	W 45-7 vs Mansfield	#135 Crowley
8	1	Longview Lobos	91.1 2462	10-6A Div 2	5-1	1918 (#14)	48.2	21.0	W 56-49 vs Rockwall	#44 Rockwall-Heath
17	5	The Woodlands Highlanders	88.9 2314	13-6A Div 1	5-1	1757 (#38)	47.3	17.2	W 54-14 vs Willis	#242 Cleveland
27	11	Klein Bearkats	85.9 2118	15-6A Div 1	7-0	1472 (#128)	35.3	9.3	W 37-14 vs Klein Cain	#35 Tomball
35	22	Tomball Cougars	85 2056	15-6A Div 2	5-1	1580 (#90)	38.8	15.8	W 36-14 vs Klein Collins	#27 Klein
36	1	The Woodlands College Park Cavaliers	84.9 2049	13-6A Div 2	3-3	1846 (#23)	36.0	30.2	W 56-0 vs Cleveland	#116 Conroe
37	5	North Forney Falcons	84.8 2041	10-6A Div 2	1-4	1975 (#11)	38.0	40.6	W 63-21 vs Tyler Legacy	#115 Forney
38	-3	Rockwall Yellowjackets	84.8 2040	10-6A Div 1	4-2	1879 (#18)	50.2	45.2	L 49-56 vs Longview	#143 Tyler Legacy
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com

District 9-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	69	Garland Sachse (3) Mustangs	80.9 1785	6-0	3-0	43.7	19.5	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2	81	Wylie East (4) Raiders	79.9 1720	4-2	3-0	44.8	22.2	6.1-0.9	> 98%	D2
3	103	Wylie (1) Pirates	77.7 1571	4-2	1-2	43.3	30.8	4.5-2.5	95.7%	D1
4	146	Garland Rowlett (7) Eagles	74.8 1384	3-3	2-1	31.8	26.2	4.2-2.9	89.4%	D2
5	155	Garland Lakeview Centennial (6) Patriots	74.3 1348	2-4	1-2	25.3	28.0	3.2-3.8	9.6%	—
6	181	Garland (5) Owls	71.7 1176	2-4	1-2	17.7	36.8	2.5-4.5	6.1%	—
7	229	North Garland (2) Raiders	65.4 760	1-5	1-2	12.7	42.8	1.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8	245	South Garland (8) Titans	60.6 442	2-4	0-3	15.0	42.0	0.1-6.9	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 10-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	8	Longview (8) Lobos	91.1 2462	5-1	3-0	48.2	21.0	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D2
2	38	Rockwall (3) Yellowjackets	84.8 2040	4-2	2-1	50.2	45.2	5.3-1.7	> 98%	D1
3	44	Rockwall-Heath (1) Hawks	84 1987	4-2	3-0	42.2	35.7	5-2	> 98%	D1
4	37	North Forney (5) Falcons	84.8 2041	1-4	1-2	38.0	40.6	4.3-2.7	91.3%	D2
5	115	Forney (2) Jackrabbits	77.1 1531	2-4	2-1	29.8	26.7	2.9-4.1	8.5%	—
6	104	Royse City (4) Bulldogs	77.6 1569	1-5	0-3	24.3	35.5	1.8-5.2	< 2%	—
7	143	Tyler Legacy (6) Red Raiders	75.3 1413	2-4	1-2	43.7	52.2	1.8-5.2	< 2%	—
8	189	Mesquite Horn (7) Jaguars	70.8 1116	0-6	0-3	30.7	62.0	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 11-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	1	North Crowley (4) Panthers	97.5 2885	6-0	3-0	38.5	15.2	7-0	> 98%	D2
2	4	Waxahachie (3) Indians	93.4 2612	5-1	2-1	47.3	25.2	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3	7	Duncanville (1) Panthers	91.5 2485	3-3	2-1	29.7	18.0	5.3-1.7	> 98%	D1
4	56	Mansfield Lake Ridge (5) Eagles	82.3 1880	4-2	2-1	38.7	40.2	3.6-3.4	67.8%	D2
5	83	Red Oak (8) Hawks	79.8 1711	4-2	2-1	26.2	27.2	3.3-3.7	32%	—
6	135	Crowley (7) Eagles	75.6 1433	2-4	1-2	27.8	27.5	1.5-5.5	< 2%	—
7	113	Mansfield (6) Tigers	77.1 1536	2-4	0-3	31.2	35.2	1.5-5.5	< 2%	—
8	197	Dallas Skyline (2) Raiders	70.1 1070	1-5	0-3	18.8	42.2	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 12-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	39	Waco Midway (1) Panthers	84.7 2038	6-1	3-0	36.4	15.6	5.5-0.5	> 98%	D1
2	54	Killeen Harker Heights (5) Knights	82.8 1909	4-2	2-0	37.2	39.5	5.2-0.8	> 98%	D2
3	106	Copperas Cove (3) Bulldawgs	77.6 1566	5-2	3-0	42.0	30.0	3.8-2.2	> 98%	D1
4	100	Lake Belton (6) Broncos	78.1 1596	3-3	0-2	33.5	35.2	3.1-2.9	78.3%	D2
5	134	Temple (2) Wildcats	75.8 1448	1-6	0-3	28.4	41.3	2.2-3.8	20.9%	—
6	213	Killeen Chaparral (7) Bobcats	67.9 920	2-4	1-1	21.8	31.2	1.2-4.8	< 2%	—
7	228	Bryan (4) Vikings	65.4 760	1-6	0-3	20.0	41.3	0.1-5.9	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 13-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	17	The Woodlands (2) Highlanders	88.9 2314	5-1	3-0	47.3	17.2	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2	36	The Woodlands College Park (5) Cavaliers	84.9 2049	3-3	2-1	36.0	30.2	5.6-1.4	97.5%	D2
3	40	Willis (7) Wildkats	84.6 2033	4-2	1-2	29.0	28.8	4.9-2.1	96.1%	D2
4	62	Conroe Grand Oaks (3) Grizzlies	81.8 1841	4-2	2-1	30.2	30.3	4.4-2.6	> 98%	D1
5	116	Conroe (1) Tigers	77.1 1530	3-3	2-1	35.5	32.5	3.2-3.8	7.9%	—
6	230	Conroe Caney Creek (6) Panthers	65.2 744	2-4	1-2	20.8	33.5	1.2-5.8	< 2%	—
7	198	Conroe Oak Ridge (8) War Eagles	70.1 1070	1-5	1-2	23.0	30.3	1.8-5.2	< 2%	—
8	242	Cleveland (4) Indians	61 465	2-4	0-3	16.5	33.7	0-7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 14-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	49	Spring Westfield (8) Mustangs	83.5 1956	4-2	3-0	24.8	6.2	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2	92	Aldine Davis (2) Falcons	78.9 1655	5-1	3-0	34.7	19.5	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3	119	Aldine Nimitz (3) Cougars	76.9 1518	3-3	2-1	23.8	27.0	4.9-2.1	96.9%	D1
4	159	Spring Dekaney (7) Wildcats	74 1327	3-3	1-2	18.5	20.3	3.4-3.6	62.9%	D2
5	164	Aldine Eisenhower (5) Eagles	73.5 1292	3-3	1-2	17.5	25.2	2.9-4.1	28.1%	—
6	200	Spring (6) Lions	70 1061	2-4	1-2	19.8	34.0	2.8-4.2	10%	—
7	210	Aldine MacArthur (1) Generals	68.2 943	4-2	1-2	30.5	25.8	1.6-5.3	2.6%	—
8	249	Aldine (4) Mustangs	56.1 143	0-6	0-3	1.2	47.3	0-7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 15-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	27	Klein (3) Bearkats	85.9 2118	7-0	5-0	35.3	9.3	7.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2	52	Klein Collins (4) Tigers	83.2 1934	5-2	4-1	40.1	24.4	6-2	97.3%	D1
3	35	Tomball (6) Cougars	85 2056	5-1	3-1	38.8	15.8	5.9-2.1	85.4%	D2
4	59	Magnolia (9) Bulldogs	82 1857	3-4	3-2	28.6	24.7	4.8-3.2	61.9%	D2
5	64	Klein Cain (1) Hurricanes	81.4 1818	4-2	2-2	39.7	30.5	4.8-3.1	44.2%	—
6	79	Klein Oak (2) Panthers	80.1 1730	2-4	2-2	34.0	23.3	3.8-4.2	11.1%	—
7	149	Tomball Memorial (7) Wildcats	74.5 1362	1-5	0-4	15.7	43.7	1.5-6.5	< 2%	—
8	181	Klein Forest (5) Golden Eagles	71.7 1176	1-6	1-4	13.0	45.1	1.4-6.6	< 2%	—
9	172	Magnolia West (8) Mustangs	72.4 1221	2-4	0-4	23.8	39.0	0.5-7.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 16-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	72	Langham Creek (6) Lobos	80.4 1754	5-1	3-0	29.2	16.2	5.7-1.3	> 98%	D2
2	46	Cy Falls (7) Golden Eagles	83.7 1967	5-1	2-1	36.3	15.7	5.4-1.6	97.2%	D2
3	85	Cy Woods (1) Wildcats	79.7 1704	4-1	2-1	32.8	20.0	4.9-2.1	90.3%	D1
4	70	Cy-Fair (3) Bobcats	80.9 1782	4-2	1-2	40.8	26.5	4.2-2.8	64.4%	D1
5	117	Cy Lakes (4) Spartans	77 1523	4-2	2-1	30.2	25.2	4.4-2.5	48%	—
6	212	Jersey Village (2) Falcons	67.9 923	1-5	1-2	16.0	23.3	1.8-5.2	< 2%	—
7	236	Cy Ridge (8) Rams	63.7 644	3-3	1-2	22.7	40.0	1-6	< 2%	—
8	225	Cy Creek (5) Cougars	65.9 788	0-6	0-3	15.0	36.3	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

Region III Top 10

Rk		Team	OVR/ Elo	Dist / Proj	Record	SOS	PPG	PAPG	Last Wk	This Wk
3	-1	Galena Park North Shore Mustangs	96.5 2816	17-6A Div 1	7-0	2121 (#4)	35.3	9.3	W 28-27 vs Humble Summer Creek	BYE
5		Katy Tigers	93 2587	22-6A Div 1	7-0	1748 (#43)	46.4	11.6	W 69-6 vs Katy Morton Ranch	#121 Katy Paetow
6		Sheldon CE King Panthers	92.9 2580	17-6A Div 2	6-1	1858 (#21)	53.7	14.1	W 70-6 vs Humble	BYE
10	-2	Fort Bend Ridge Point Panthers	90.9 2445	21-6A Div 2	7-0	1673 (#60)	41.9	12.9	W 61-7 vs Fort Bend Elkins	BYE
12	-1	Pearland Oilers	90 2385	19-6A Div 1	7-0	1419 (#152)	47.6	9.9	W 59-7 vs Alvin	BYE
13		Humble Summer Creek Bulldogs	89.8 2373	17-6A Div 1	4-3	1884 (#17)	38.0	16.1	L 27-28 vs Galena Park North Shore	BYE
16		Humble Atascocita Eagles	89 2319	17-6A Div 2	4-3	2066 (#7)	29.0	20.3	W 70-0 vs Channelview	BYE
22	-2	Dickinson Gators	87.3 2210	18-6A Div 1	3-3	1832 (#25)	39.5	17.5	BYE	#43 Barbers Hill
23		Alvin Shadow Creek Sharks	87.2 2203	19-6A Div 2	5-1	1686 (#57)	42.7	8.5	W 52-0 vs Pasadena Memorial	#28 Manvel
24		Bridgeland Bears	87.2 2199	23-6A Div 1	5-1	1860 (#20)	36.3	22.7	W 49-8 vs Richmond George Ranch	#47 Fulshear
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com

District 17-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	3	Galena Park North Shore (1) Mustangs	96.5 2816	7-0	4-0	35.3	9.3	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D1
2	6	Sheldon CE King (3) Panthers	92.9 2580	6-1	4-0	53.7	14.1	6-1	> 98%	D2
3	13	Humble Summer Creek (2) Bulldogs	89.8 2373	4-3	3-1	38.0	16.1	4.8-2.2	96.3%	D1
4	16	Humble Atascocita (4) Eagles	89 2319	4-3	2-2	29.0	20.3	4.3-2.7	93.2%	D2
5	68	Crosby (8) Cougars	81 1793	4-3	2-2	29.1	29.9	3-4	10%	—
6	95	Humble Kingwood (7) Mustangs	78.7 1639	3-4	1-3	29.9	36.6	1.7-5.3	< 2%	—
7	126	Humble (5) Wildcats	76.2 1472	1-6	0-4	15.9	43.1	1.5-5.5	< 2%	—
8	227	Channelview (6) Falcons	65.7 780	0-7	0-4	12.0	57.4	0-7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 18-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	22	Dickinson (2) Gators	87.3 2210	3-3	3-0	39.5	17.5	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2	30	Deer Park (1) Deer	85.6 2095	6-0	3-0	45.8	9.8	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3	43	Barbers Hill (8) Eagles	84.2 2004	6-0	3-0	50.7	15.2	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D2
4	96	Clear Falls (4) Knights	78.7 1637	3-3	2-1	31.2	31.8	3.7-3.3	65.3%	D2
5	118	Clear Springs (3) Chargers	76.9 1518	2-4	1-2	18.2	29.3	3.3-3.7	34.9%	—
6	183	Clear Creek (6) Wildcats	71.3 1150	1-5	0-3	16.5	37.0	1.6-5.4	< 2%	—
7	188	Clear Lake (5) Falcons	70.8 1116	2-4	0-3	18.5	46.0	1.5-5.5	< 2%	—
8	233	Clear Brook (7) Wolverines	64.3 686	1-5	0-3	17.8	51.7	0.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 19-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	12	Pearland (2) Oilers	90 2385	7-0	5-0	47.6	9.9	7.7-0.3	> 98%	D1
2	23	Alvin Shadow Creek (6) Sharks	87.2 2203	5-1	4-0	42.7	8.5	6.9-1.1	> 98%	D2
3	28	Manvel (9) Mavericks	85.7 2101	5-1	3-1	46.5	8.0	6.2-1.8	> 98%	D2
4	109	Pearland Dawson (5) Eagles	77.4 1551	3-4	3-2	24.6	32.4	4.7-3.3	89%	D1
5	170	Pasadena Dobie (1) Longhorns	72.8 1248	2-4	1-3	17.3	33.0	2.8-5.2	4.7%	—
6	187	Pasadena Memorial (3) Mavericks	70.9 1123	3-4	2-3	22.7	41.1	2.8-5.2	3.8%	—
7	165	Brazoswood (7) Buccaneers	73.5 1292	3-3	2-2	25.5	34.3	3.6-4.3	2.8%	—
8	235	Alvin (4) Yellowjackets	64.2 678	0-6	0-4	17.5	48.0	0.7-7.3	< 2%	—
9	237	Pasadena Sam Rayburn (8) Texans	63.6 637	1-6	0-5	15.0	38.0	0.4-7.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 20-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	51	Houston Memorial (6) Mustangs	83.3 1946	6-0	4-0	44.5	9.7	7.5-0.5	> 98%	D2
2	76	Houston Lamar (4) Texans	80.1 1731	4-2	4-0	31.8	18.4	6.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3	132	Alief Taylor (5) Lions	76 1457	6-1	4-1	39.0	16.7	5.3-2.7	> 98%	D1
4	156	Houston Stratford (9) Spartans	74.3 1345	2-4	2-2	21.7	28.2	4.4-3.6	46.4%	D2
5	148	Houston Heights (8) Bulldogs	74.6 1367	2-4	2-2	24.3	23.2	4.3-3.7	45.8%	—
6	195	Alief Hastings (2) Bears	70.4 1088	3-4	2-3	22.4	27.7	3.7-4.3	8.3%	—
7	214	Alief Elsik (1) Rams	67.8 920	1-5	1-3	10.7	30.7	2.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8	231	Houston Bellaire (3) Cardinals	65.1 735	1-6	1-4	12.8	44.8	1.6-6.4	< 2%	—
9	243	Houston Westside (7) Wolves	61 464	0-7	0-5	7.1	47.4	0-8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 21-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	10	Fort Bend Ridge Point (4) Panthers	90.9 2445	7-0	4-0	41.9	12.9	6.9-0.1	> 98%	D2
2	63	Fort Bend Hightower (8) Hurricanes	81.6 1828	5-2	4-0	36.3	13.4	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D2
3	71	Fort Bend Travis (1) Tigers	80.7 1770	6-1	4-0	32.7	21.0	5.3-1.7	> 98%	D1
4	124	Strake Jesuit (2) Crusaders	76.5 1493	2-5	2-2	18.4	27.4	3.5-3.5	59.2%	D1
5	127	Fort Bend Elkins (3) Knights	76.1 1464	2-5	1-3	22.0	31.0	3.2-3.8	38.9%	—
6	174	Fort Bend Bush (7) Broncos	72.3 1215	1-6	1-3	12.4	35.4	1.9-5.1	< 2%	—
7	193	Fort Bend Clements (6) Rangers	70.5 1095	3-4	0-4	26.7	33.9	1.3-5.7	< 2%	—
8	217	Fort Bend Austin (5) Bulldogs	67.1 869	1-6	0-4	19.3	30.3	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 22-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	5	Katy (4) Tigers	93 2587	7-0	5-0	46.4	11.6	8-0	> 98%	D1
2	57	Katy Tompkins (6) Falcons	82.2 1870	3-3	3-1	29.0	30.3	6.6-1.4	> 98%	D2
3	73	Katy Jordan (3) Warriors	80.3 1745	4-2	3-2	33.7	26.0	5.6-2.4	97.7%	D1
4	112	Katy Taylor (5) Mustangs	77.2 1540	5-2	3-2	25.6	21.4	4.3-3.7	66.1%	D2
5	123	Katy Cinco Ranch (2) Cougars	76.8 1510	3-3	3-2	23.5	27.0	4.3-3.7	28.8%	—
6	121	Katy Paetow (7) Panthers	76.8 1511	2-4	2-2	21.8	27.7	3.5-4.5	8%	—
7	173	Katy Morton Ranch (8) Mavericks	72.3 1216	2-4	1-3	19.0	37.2	2-6	< 2%	—
8	190	Katy Mayde Creek (9) Rams	70.8 1114	1-5	0-4	21.8	40.0	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
9	205	Katy Seven Lakes (1) Spartans	69.2 1008	0-6	0-4	15.0	42.5	0.6-7.4	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 23-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	24	Bridgeland (1) Bears	87.2 2199	5-1	3-0	36.3	22.7	6.4-0.6	> 98%	D1
2	25	Cy Ranch (2) Mustangs	86.6 2165	5-1	2-1	33.5	15.0	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3	47	Fulshear (3) Chargers	83.6 1966	5-1	2-1	34.7	12.3	5-2	96.2%	D2
4	50	Waller (4) Bulldogs	83.4 1950	5-1	2-1	47.8	21.5	4.4-2.6	95.8%	D2
5	107	Cy Springs (6) Panthers	77.5 1559	2-4	1-2	35.2	34.8	2.7-4.3	5.2%	—
6	153	Richmond George Ranch (8) Longhorns	74.4 1355	3-3	1-2	22.3	31.3	2.4-4.6	3.5%	—
7	171	Richmond Foster (7) Falcons	72.6 1233	2-4	1-2	15.7	29.5	1.3-5.7	< 2%	—
8	226	Cy Park (5) Tigers	65.8 782	1-5	0-3	13.7	35.0	0.1-6.9	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 24-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	29	Cedar Park (6) Timberwolves	85.6 2096	7-0	3-0	46.9	19.1	5.5-0.5	> 98%	D2
2	34	Austin Vandegrift (4) Vipers	85 2056	4-2	2-0	32.5	24.7	5-1	> 98%	D2
3	55	Hutto (1) Hippos	82.5 1894	5-2	2-1	56.9	26.1	4.1-1.9	> 98%	D1
4	99	Leander Rouse (3) Raiders	78.1 1600	4-3	2-1	31.6	22.4	3.2-2.8	94.6%	D1
5	175	Georgetown East View (5) Patriots	72.2 1209	2-4	0-2	22.2	34.7	1.4-4.6	5.2%	—
6	150	Cedar Park Vista Ridge (2) Rangers	74.5 1360	2-5	0-3	29.1	51.6	1.6-4.4	< 2%	—
7	223	Leander (7) Lions	66 798	1-5	0-2	17.8	31.3	0.3-5.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

Region IV Top 10

Rk		Team	OVR/ Elo	Dist / Proj	Record	SOS	PPG	PAPG	Last Wk	This Wk
15		Austin Westlake Chaparrals	89.2 2332	25-6A Div 2	5-1	1783 (#32)	42.0	18.0	W 57-0 vs Round Rock Westwood	#191 Round Rock McNeil
18		San Antonio Johnson Jaguars	88.5 2290	28-6A Div 1	5-0	1381 (#167)	48.8	11.2	W 65-18 vs San Antonio Roosevelt	#177 San Antonio Clark
20	-1	Cibolo Steele Knights	87.5 2221	27-6A Div 1	4-1-1	1717 (#52)	46.5	23.5	W 56-7 vs San Marcos	#120 Converse Judson
26	-1	Dripping Springs Tigers	86.5 2153	26-6A Div 2	5-1	1426 (#144)	49.0	15.7	W 41-3 vs Austin High	#65 Austin Bowie
33	-4	Lake Travis Cavaliers	85.1 2062	25-6A Div 1	2-2-1	1825 (#28)	38.8	27.6	L 34-35 vs Round Rock Cedar Ridge	#158 Round Rock Stony Point
41		San Antonio Brennan Bears	84.6 2028	29-6A Div 1	5-1	1390 (#165)	50.5	7.0	BYE	#222 San Antonio Stevens
42	1	Round Rock Dragons	84.4 2019	25-6A Div 1	4-2	1905 (#15)	35.8	34.2	BYE	#201 Round Rock Westwood
53		San Antonio Harlan Hawks	83 1927	29-6A Div 1	5-1	1255 (#201)	41.5	13.8	W 54-6 vs San Antonio Taft	#102 San Antonio Sotomayor
61	3	Round Rock Cedar Ridge Raiders	81.9 1852	25-6A Div 2	7-0	1462 (#132)	46.0	20.4	W 35-34 vs Lake Travis	BYE
65	3	Austin Bowie Bulldogs	81.4 1816	26-6A Div 1	5-1	1344 (#180)	45.2	18.5	W 36-6 vs Buda Hays Consolidated	#26 Dripping Springs
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com

District 25-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	15	Austin Westlake (3) Chaparrals	89.2 2332	5-1	2-0	42.0	18.0	5.6-0.4	> 98%	D2
2	61	Round Rock Cedar Ridge (5) Raiders	81.9 1852	7-0	3-0	46.0	20.4	4.3-1.6	96.3%	D2
3	42	Round Rock (1) Dragons	84.4 2019	4-2	1-1	35.8	34.2	4.1-1.9	> 98%	D1
4	33	Lake Travis (2) Cavaliers	85.1 2062	2-2	1-1	38.8	27.6	3.7-2.3	96.6%	D1
5	158	Round Rock Stony Point (7) Tigers	74.1 1335	3-4	2-1	32.1	33.4	2.2-3.8	7.4%	—
6	201	Round Rock Westwood (4) Warriors	69.9 1059	1-6	0-3	13.7	37.3	0.5-5.5	< 2%	—
7	191	Round Rock McNeil (6) Mavericks	70.5 1099	0-7	0-3	20.4	56.6	0.6-5.4	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 26-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	26	Dripping Springs (4) Tigers	86.5 2153	5-1	3-0	49.0	15.7	5.8-0.2	> 98%	D2
2	65	Austin Bowie (3) Bulldogs	81.4 1816	5-1	2-0	45.2	18.5	5.1-0.9	> 98%	D1
3	137	Buda Hays Consolidated (5) Hawks	75.6 1432	4-3	1-2	34.0	25.9	3-3	92.8%	D2
4	168	Buda Johnson (2) Jaguars	73.3 1279	2-5	1-2	24.1	38.7	2.7-3.3	58.5%	D1
5	180	Austin High (7) Maroons	71.8 1184	1-5	1-2	16.3	31.7	3.3-2.7	48.1%	—
6	234	Austin Del Valle (1) Cardinals	64.2 681	1-5	1-1	19.7	39.0	1.2-4.8	< 2%	—
7	248	Austin Akins (6) Eagles	58.2 282	1-5	0-2	13.7	52.3	0-6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 27-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	20	Cibolo Steele (2) Knights	87.5 2221	4-1	3-0	46.5	23.5	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2	76	San Antonio East Central (1) Hornets	80.1 1731	5-1	3-0	32.8	16.5	5.3-1.7	> 98%	D1
3	94	San Antonio Pieper (8) Warriors	78.7 1642	3-3	2-1	40.3	36.2	4.8-2.2	92.5%	D2
4	120	Converse Judson (5) Rockets	76.8 1513	2-3	2-1	43.4	47.2	3.8-3.2	77.8%	D2
5	125	Schertz Clemens (3) Buffaloes	76.3 1479	4-2	1-2	32.0	30.3	3-4	17.3%	—
6	152	New Braunfels Canyon (4) Cougars	74.5 1358	3-3	1-2	14.3	20.7	2.4-4.6	10.2%	—
7	169	San Marcos (6) Rattlers	72.9 1254	0-6	0-3	15.5	40.0	1.4-5.7	2.6%	—
8	202	Converse Wagner (7) Thunderbirds	69.9 1053	1-4	0-3	21.6	34.8	0.7-6.3	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 28-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	18	San Antonio Johnson (2) Jaguars	88.5 2290	5-0	3-0	48.8	11.2	6.9-0.1	> 98%	D1
2	74	San Antonio Reagan (1) Rattlers	80.3 1744	3-2	3-0	20.3	25.2	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3	147	San Antonio Roosevelt (7) Rough Riders	74.7 1374	3-3	2-1	33.3	37.8	4-3	73.6%	D2
4	128	San Antonio Brandeis (4) Broncos	76 1461	3-3	1-2	23.7	26.2	3.8-3.2	74.4%	D2
5	141	San Antonio Madison (6) Mavericks	75.4 1423	4-2	1-2	22.5	18.0	3.2-3.8	43.7%	—
6	192	San Antonio Churchill (8) Chargers	70.5 1096	1-5	1-2	26.3	45.0	2.2-4.8	5.7%	—
7	177	San Antonio Clark (3) Cougars	72 1197	1-5	1-2	20.7	30.0	1.7-5.3	2.5%	—
8	220	San Antonio Lee (5) Volunteers	66.6 836	3-3	0-3	23.7	31.7	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 29-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	41	San Antonio Brennan (2) Bears	84.6 2028	5-1	4-0	50.5	7.0	7.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2	53	San Antonio Harlan (1) Hawks	83 1927	5-1	4-0	41.5	13.8	7.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
3	102	San Antonio Sotomayor (3) Wildcats	77.9 1586	5-2	4-1	26.7	17.1	5.9-2.1	> 98%	D2
4	162	San Antonio Warren (6) Warriors	73.8 1317	4-3	3-2	29.4	30.4	4.9-3.1	97.9%	D2
5	178	San Antonio Taft (4) Raiders	72 1192	4-3	2-3	24.9	29.4	3.7-4.3	2.1%	—
6	185	San Antonio O’Connor (7) Panthers	71 1131	3-3	2-2	26.2	24.0	3.5-4.5	< 2%	—
7	222	San Antonio Stevens (8) Falcons	66 800	2-5	1-4	10.9	36.1	1.7-6.3	< 2%	—
8	232	San Antonio Marshall (5) Rams	64.4 693	1-5	0-4	12.8	45.2	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
9	241	San Antonio Holmes (9) Huskies	61.9 523	1-5	0-4	13.7	33.7	0.4-7.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 30-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	110	Laredo United (1) Longhorns	77.3 1549	3-2	3-0	28.3	21.3	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2	161	Laredo Alexander (4) Bulldogs	73.9 1319	4-2	3-0	32.0	27.0	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D2
3	176	Laredo Johnson (2) Wolves	72.2 1205	4-2	2-1	35.5	25.2	4.6-2.4	90.7%	D1
4	203	Eagle Pass (6) Eagles	69.6 1033	2-4	1-2	23.3	33.7	3.4-3.6	57.6%	D2
5	207	Laredo United South (3) Panthers	68.9 988	2-4	2-1	18.3	25.5	3.5-3.5	46.6%	—
6	224	San Antonio Southwest (7) Dragons	65.9 791	1-4	1-2	16.6	26.0	2-5	3.8%	—
7	218	San Antonio Southwest Legacy (8) Titans	66.9 856	2-3	0-3	25.2	26.8	1.7-5.3	< 2%	—
8	240	Del Rio (5) Rams	62.2 547	0-6	0-3	10.0	33.7	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 31-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	87	Edinburg Vela (5) Sabercats	79.5 1690	5-1	1-0	36.8	27.3	4.8-0.1	> 98%	D2
2	142	Weslaco (1) Panthers	75.3 1417	3-3	0-1	32.8	22.2	3.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3	199	Edinburg Economedes (2) Jaguars	70 1062	2-4	1-0	23.2	33.3	2.8-2.2	97.2%	D1
4	208	La Joya (4) Coyotes	68.5 963	3-3	1-0	36.8	35.7	2.2-2.8	76.7%	D2
5	216	Edinburg (6) Bobcats	67.2 874	4-2	0-1	27.2	19.8	1.4-3.6	26.5%	—
6	244	Edinburg North (3) Cougars	60.7 447	0-6	0-1	13.5	47.5	0.2-4.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo

District 32-6A

Rk		Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1	67	PSJA North (6) Raiders	81.1 1798	5-1	1-0	45.5	19.7	4.5-0.5	> 98%	D2
2	138	Harlingen (3) Cardinals	75.5 1428	4-2	1-0	31.3	20.7	2.9-2.1	85.9%	D2
3	167	San Benito (2) Greyhounds	73.3 1282	4-2	1-0	20.3	25.7	2.7-2.3	76.9%	D1
4	150	Los Fresnos (1) Falcons	74.5 1360	3-3	0-1	34.0	34.7	2.3-2.7	67.2%	D1
5	136	Brownsville Veterans Memorial (4) Chargers	75.6 1432	4-2	0-1	28.3	29.3	2.1-2.9	66.3%	—
6	211	PSJA (5) Bears	68.1 934	2-4	0-1	18.2	23.5	0.5-4.5	3.7%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 \| @TexasTNG \| texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team’s current Elo